About the Antique Rugs of the Future Project
Sheep Breeds of Azerbaijan
Shearing, Sorting, Washing, Carding, Spinning
"The advantages of handspun yarn to machine spun yarn"
Rediscovery of Ancient Natural Dyes
Our Natural Dyestuffs
Difference between synthetically and naturally dyed rugs
Weaving and Finishing Steps
Galleries of ARFP Caucasian Azerbaijani Rugs
"Early Karabagh rugs and carpets" main page
Early Azerbaijan (Proto-Pinwheel) rug, circa 1800, Azerbaijan (Shirvan/Kuba or Karabagh)
A SOUTH CAUCASIAN CARPET
Price Realized £12,000 ($23,832)
Christie's Sale 7390
Oriental Rugs and Carpets
16 April 2007
London, King Street
18-A SOUTH CAUCASIAN CARPET
Overall wear, corroded black, rewoven areas, scattered repiling, sides partially rewoven, ends rewoven
9ft.2in. x 5ft.10in. (279cm. x 178cm.)
Anon sale, Sotheby's London, 19 November 1971, lot 27
Anon sale, in these Rooms, 22 November 1973, lot 214
Sold in these Rooms, 17 October, 1996, lot 402.
This carpet is probably from the same workshops as two in the Textile Museum, Washington D.C.; Charles Grant-Ellis, Early Caucasian Rugs, Washington D.C., 1975, nos.13 and 14, pp.56-59. In all three cases not only is the size of each very close, this being marginally the largest, but the borders are also identical. They appear to represent a stage in the development of Caucasian carpets between the large format rugs of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and the classic Kazak and Karabagh rugs of the second half of the nineteenth century. Both the other two rugs are debased versions of the classic dragon design. Here the design, while not so immediately close to an earlier prototype, certainly has a power of composition and colour, particularly with its most unusual yellow field, that is greater than the others. Another slightly later rug than the present example but having exactly the same arrangment of motifs on a red rather than a yellow field was exhibited in the L.A.Mayer Memorial Museum; R. Hasson, Caucasian Rugs, Jerusalem, 1986, no.38, pp.96-97, attributed there to Karagashli in the Kuba district).
Its earlier prototype is closer to the rugs attributed by Grant-Ellis possibly to the Shusha district of the Karabagh region; Grant-Ellis, op. cit., no.20, pp.70-1. The large palmettes and central panel certainly appear to be related to that earlier design. But the construction of the design with two bold X-designs running through the various motifs is precisely the same as that of the white ground 'star' Kazaks of the second half of the nineteenth century. The only difference here is that the continuous design has in effect been cut to give complete X-panels rather than a central panel flanked by two half designs. In both the 'star' Kazak group and the present rug there are motifs in exactly the same placings, the only difference being one of porportion. Thus the palmettes above and below the central lozenge are, in the Kazak rugs, reduced to simple arrowhead flanking panels. And it must be more than coincidence that the borders of some of the Star Kazak rugs are formed of S-motifs.
This rug therefore fits exactly midway in the development of the most collectable of all 19th century Kazak rugs from the more classically Persian influenced products of the previous century, and adds considerably to our appreciation of how the design evolved.